<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>c0t0d0s0.org - Aviation</title>
    <link>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/</link>
    <description>the sun in a lighthungry universe</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>756 vs. 662</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/501037038/5166-756-vs.-662.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5166-756-vs.-662.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5166</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5166</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The winner in the category "Most fix aircraft orders" is: Airbus. They were able to gather 756 orders whereas Boeing just got 662. But these numbers show another interesting trend: The boom seems to be over. This years order combined are just a little bit higher as the numbers of each of them last year (Boeing was the winner last year with 1.412 orders. Airbus had 1.342) 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/501037038" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:18:42 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5166-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5166-756-vs.-662.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Crash twittering</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/492154300/5143-Crash-twittering.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5143-Crash-twittering.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5143</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5143</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    As you may have read in the news, there was a plane crash in Denver. A <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/12/21/320383/continental-737-badly-damaged-38-injured-in-denver-take-off-accident.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/12/21/320383/continental-737-badly-damaged-38-injured-in-denver-take-off-accident.html">Continental 737 left the runway in the wrong direction at take off</a>. But this one is a little bit different: Mike Wilson - one of the passengers - <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/twitter.com/2drinksbehind');"  href="http://twitter.com/2drinksbehind">twittered</a> about his experience.<br />
<br />
<center><a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/twitter.com/2drinksbehind/status/1069832870');"  class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://twitter.com/2drinksbehind/status/1069832870' target="_blank"><!-- s9ymdb:553 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="400" height="159" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/Bild6_thumbnail2.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt=""  /></a></center><br />
I don´t think i would have the nerves to even remember that there is something called "Internet" after surviving plane crash. I´m glad that there wasn´t any fatalities at this crash. As far as a read the incoming news they directly crashed in front of a fire station. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/492154300" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:46:53 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5143-guid.html</guid>
    <category>aviation</category>
<category>crash</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5143-Crash-twittering.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>24 hours of air traffic</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/489388217/5136-24-hours-of-air-traffic.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5136-24-hours-of-air-traffic.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5136</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5136</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <center><a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XBwjQsOEeg');"  class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XBwjQsOEeg' target="_blank"><!-- s9ymdb:551 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="400" height="225" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/airtraffic.serendipityThumb.png" alt=""  /></a><br />
<small><a href='href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XBwjQsOEeg'>(click to view)</a></small></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/489388217" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:26:10 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5136-guid.html</guid>
    <category>air traffic</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5136-24-hours-of-air-traffic.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Delamination dementi</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/488534217/5133-Delamination-dementi.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5133-Delamination-dementi.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5133</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5133</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There were some rumours last week about the delamination of the wings, albeit the <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/12/whats-up-with-this-wing-delami.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/12/whats-up-with-this-wing-delami.html">Flightblogger was able to gather some other informations</a> that this rumours was nonsense. But after almost 15 years in the computer business i´ve got a fine sensor for half-a... dementis.  Ben Sandilands writes in  <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2008/12/16/boeing-avoids-the-d-word/');"  href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2008/12/16/boeing-avoids-the-d-word/">Boeing avoids the D word</a> about a statement he was able to gather from Jon Ostrower (the flightblogger) which he got from Boeing:<blockquote>Our tests continue to confirm that the composite construction of the 787, including the wing, is sound. The 787, like every commercial jetliner, is going through a rigorous series of tests to verify the safety and certificability of its structure, systems and operations. The FAA will review the results of this compliance activity prior to certifying the airplane for commercial use.</blockquote>I don´t think, that´s  a good dementi. I would like to hear "There is no delamination. Period." instead of "When we get this plane through certification, you can be sure that there is no problems with the wings" 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/488534217" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:38:28 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5133-guid.html</guid>
    <category>787</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<category>boeing</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5133-Delamination-dementi.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A380 vs. Boeing 787 delay</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/484523623/5119-A380-vs.-Boeing-787-delay.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5119-A380-vs.-Boeing-787-delay.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5119</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5119</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    After the last delay in the 787 program <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/news.google.de/news/url?sa=T&amp;amp;ct=us/9-0&amp;amp;fd=R&amp;amp;url=http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/boeings_787_dreamliner_delayed_again-2.html&amp;amp;cid=1279471478&amp;amp;ei=T4ZBSZvuC4OUwwHJ2Lhl&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwQBUq-txGxg4wt-i-CeYqoXHjGQ');"  href="http://news.google.de/news/url?sa=T&amp;ct=us/9-0&amp;fd=R&amp;url=http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/boeings_787_dreamliner_delayed_again-2.html&amp;cid=1279471478&amp;ei=T4ZBSZvuC4OUwwHJ2Lhl&amp;usg=AFQjCNGwQBUq-txGxg4wt-i-CeYqoXHjGQ">many news outlets</a> write, that the delays in the 787 program reached the delays in the A380 program. There is only one important fact, they forget to report. The A380 was late just three months at first flight. The problems leading to the two years delay hit them afterwards. The 787 has already accumulated 2 years of delay before this aircrafts first flight. To be exact: At the moment nobody knows, if this airframe will fly ... there are just computer models and experience suggesting that this heap of plastic will take of at the end of the runway. They made a break-test of the wing box ... not the complete wing.  So ... it´s 3 month delay in the A380 program compared to 2 years in the 787 program. <br />
<br />
But Boeing has a good chance not to gather that much delay after first flight for the first delivery as the 787 is a much smaller plane. On the other side there are the first rumours and discussions, that Boeing isn´t able to build enough planes fast enough for their ultra-aggressive schedule for flight-testing. But that´s a different story.<br />
<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/484523623" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:05:50 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5119-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5119-A380-vs.-Boeing-787-delay.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Airbus Auto Brake</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/479949573/5103-Airbus-Auto-Brake.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5103-Airbus-Auto-Brake.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5103</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5103</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Many people in flight communities say "Don´t compare your MS Flight Simulator experiences with real flying" and they are correct about that. But sometimes i have the strange feeling that modern aviation gets nearer to the Flight Simulator (as long the computers are functional). Flight Global writes <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/12/09/319920/airbus-readies-new-tools-to-prevent-runway-excursions.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/12/09/319920/airbus-readies-new-tools-to-prevent-runway-excursions.html">about an interesting feature</a> ... the Brake-to-Vacate:<blockquote>The BTV system shows pilots two lines on the electronic airport diagram on the A380's navigation display. The first line shows the minimum stopping distance for dry pavement (assuming no reverse thrust). The second line shows the minimum stopping distance for a wet runway. Pilots can then select their desired turn-off point on the display using a cursor, and the system internally computes the required auto-braking deceleration profile. Contaminated runway scenarios will be addressed in later versions of the programme, says Tarnowski.</blockquote>The system even warns the pilot, if the remaining runway doesn´t suffice to stop the aircraft. The pilot can order an go-around in that case. At the moment this feature is integrated into the A380, but the article states, that this feature will go into the A320 and A330/340 as well. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/479949573" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:17:49 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5103-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5103-Airbus-Auto-Brake.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>in retrospect</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/476970863/5091-in-retrospect.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5091-in-retrospect.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5091</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5091</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    May 2005 - i´ve lost my fear of flying ....<br />
<br />
December 2008 ... <br />
<center><!-- s9ymdb:541 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="400" height="108" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/Bild24.serendipityThumb.png" alt=""  /></center><br />
<br />
<small>(inspired by a conversation with a good friend)</small> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/476970863" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:15:32 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5091-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5091-in-retrospect.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Yet another delay in the 787 program</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/475504662/5087-Yet-another-delay-in-the-787-program.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5087-Yet-another-delay-in-the-787-program.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5087</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5087</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The Chicago Tribune <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-081204boeing-delay,0,3786152.story');"  href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-081204boeing-delay,0,3786152.story">reports</a>:<blockquote>The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that the first of the largely composite jets isn't likely to be delivered before mid-2010, more than two years behind schedule.<br />
<br />
But a source close to the program said the jet's launch could occur even later, especially if flight-testing for the all-new aircraft takes longer than the aggressive schedule that Chicago-based Boeing has planned.</blockquote>When it rains, it pours. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/475504662" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:03:27 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5087-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5087-Yet-another-delay-in-the-787-program.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Leaked Airbus "787  lessons learned" presentation</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/475081826/5085-Leaked-Airbus-787-lessons-learned-presentation.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5085-Leaked-Airbus-787-lessons-learned-presentation.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5085</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5085</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The flightblogger was able to publish an article in the "once-in-a-lifetime-scoop"-class. He was able <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/12/exclusive-airbus-dreamliner-do.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/12/exclusive-airbus-dreamliner-do.html">to obtain a internal Airbus presentation,</a>that leaked somehow. This presentation is named "Boeing 787 Lessons Learnt October 2008" and it´s based on informations and rumours from suppliers and openly available information. Some of the slides are based on Boeing presentations. This is the reason, why some people cry "Foul!" at the moment ... but this kind of intelligence is quite normal in business (Sometimes all you need is to google for presentation to get very interesting informations about IBM newest FUD). <br />
<br />
But the important point is something different: The 787 programm seems to be in a horrible state according to this presentation. Just half of of it would be really bad from my perspective. Let´s wait and see, how Boeing reacts to this document.<br />
<br />
<b>Update:</b> Two sources near to the A380 program told me, that this presentation is a fake, albeit a good fake.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/475081826" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:29:18 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5085-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5085-Leaked-Airbus-787-lessons-learned-presentation.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A380 too quiet</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/475081827/5084-A380-too-quiet.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5084-A380-too-quiet.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5084</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5084</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay, we all laughed about the comment of a Boeing guy who stated that the A380 is too quiet. But there  seems to be an "too quiet" problem in this aircraft. There is a crew restroom in the A380 for long distance flights. Normally it´s located in the front of the aircraft, but in Emirates machines have this room in the back. The problem: They can´t sleep - the passengers are too loud and there are no engine noises to overlap the passengers.<a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/12/03/319698/airbus-to-help-emirates-pilots-sleep-after-crews-find-a380-too-quiet.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/12/03/319698/airbus-to-help-emirates-pilots-sleep-after-crews-find-a380-too-quiet.html">Flightglobal</a> writes:<blockquote>The pilots say that the lack of engine noise in the A380's cabin compared with other long-haul airliners means they are constantly disturbed by sounds created by passengers, such as crying babies, flushing vacuum toilets and call bells. Passengers also mistake the rest area for a lavatory, and pull the door handle.</blockquote><br />
<small>(Thanks to <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/blog.koehntopp.de/');"  href="http://blog.koehntopp.de/">Kris</a> for the hint)</small> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/475081827" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:42:37 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5084-guid.html</guid>
    <category>a380</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5084-A380-too-quiet.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Low flying</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/469914047/5064-Low-flying.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5064-Low-flying.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5064</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5064</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/vowe.net/archives/010098.html');"  href="http://vowe.net/archives/010098.html">Vowe</a> got me at my two weak points with linking to this video: aircrafts and good music. I can look at such videos for hours:<br />
<br />
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NadyirHsGmw&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NadyirHsGmw&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
PS: Perhaps i should  really thinking about learning to fly. I´m asked about that by colleagues, friends and readers in quite a regular manner. But at the moment i´m glad that i´ve lost my fear of flying. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/469914047" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:51:40 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5064-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5064-Low-flying.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>747-8 delayed</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/466038619/5058-747-8-delayed.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5058-747-8-delayed.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5058</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5058</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The delays at the 787 program hide a little bit the delays at another important programm of Boeing. The regenerated 747 will be delayed, too <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/11/25/319059/747-8-schedule-undone-by-787-crisis-management-errors.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/11/25/319059/747-8-schedule-undone-by-787-crisis-management-errors.html">747-8 schedule undone by 787 crisis, management errors </a>. Stephen Trimble writes in his article:<blockquote>Boeing shifted the delivery date for the 747-8 Freighter to Cargolux from late 2009 to the third quarter of 2010. First delivery of the 747-8 Intercontinental, a passenger variant struggling to attract orders, dropped from late 2010 to the second quarter of 2011.</blockquote>and<blockquote>The flight-test phase is now allotted between seven and nine months to complete, Teal says. By comparison, Boeing completed the flight-test programme for the 777-200LR, a perhaps less ambitious derivative programme, in about 10 months in 2005.</blockquote>At just 20 (+8 for Boeing Business Jet as a customer) orders for the 747-8 but 78 for the freighter i wouldn´t be suprised a lot if see more delays for the passenger variant to help the 747-8F. It´s like in computer engineering ... given a fixed number of engineering cyles you have to find an economical sensible distribution. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/466038619" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:25:09 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5058-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5058-747-8-delayed.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Faulty parts on all Boeing jets</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/466038620/5057-Faulty-parts-on-all-Boeing-jets.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5057-Faulty-parts-on-all-Boeing-jets.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5057</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5057</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The problem with faulty (without anticorrosion plating) nutplates just got bigger. James Wallace writes in "<a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/155438.asp?source=rss');"  href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/155438.asp?source=rss">Faulty parts on all Boeing jets</a>":<blockquote>Those nonconforming nutplates that I wrote about a couple of weeks ago are on all Boeing jets, not just the 737. But there are far fewer on the 747, 777 and 767 than are on the 737. Still, Boeing said Tuesday that they must all be found and replaced before any more planes are delivered.</blockquote>I assume, those faulty nutplates are in already delivered aircrafts, too. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/466038620" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:00:56 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5057-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5057-Faulty-parts-on-all-Boeing-jets.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>787 Dreamliner production frozen as fastener issue paces program</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/464066547/5049-787-Dreamliner-production-frozen-as-fastener-issue-paces-program.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5049-787-Dreamliner-production-frozen-as-fastener-issue-paces-program.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5049</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5049</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The flight blogger published an really interesting article, again - <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/787-dreamliner-production-froz.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/787-dreamliner-production-froz.html">787 Dreamliner production frozen as fastener issue paces program</a><br />
<br />
At first it looks like there is finally a number of fasteners awaiting their substitution.<blockquote>The Seattle Times, citing sources familiar with the situation, reports that 2000 fasteners will need to be replaced on the aft fuselage and 3000 for the forward fuselage produced by Spirit Aerosystems.</blockquote>Furthermore they had to disassemble the Dreamline One again. They had to remove more than just the engines:<blockquote>Dreamliners One through Four have had their engine pylons removed and returned to Spirit AeroSystems for fastener repairs. As a result, the Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines from Dreamliner One have been removed and positioned behind the aircraft.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/464066547" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:30 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5049-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5049-787-Dreamliner-production-frozen-as-fastener-issue-paces-program.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Airbus says Boeing strike was big help</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/463813869/5047-Airbus-says-Boeing-strike-was-big-help.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5047-Airbus-says-Boeing-strike-was-big-help.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5047</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5047</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <p><a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/388976_airbus22.html?source=rss');"  href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/388976_airbus22.html?source=rss">Airbus says Boeing strike was big help</a>:<blockquote> "PARIS -- Airbus benefited from the recent strike by workers at The Boeing Co. as it gave stretched suppliers more time to focus on orders from the European jet maker, the company said Friday."</blockquote>I assume the people at Boeing bite their back at the moment. The strike did not only postponed the delivery of all airplanes at Boeing. They even helped their biggest competitor. <br />
<br />
I assume the ongoing delays in the 787 Delayliner, 747-8 and 777F programs will help Airbus, too. Some suppliers stopped already the manufacturing for Boeing for some time. More time for them to work for Airbus. At the end many parts of an aircraft (either Boeing or Airbus) are from the same manufacturers. BTW: This is the the same reason, why "Buy american" or "Buy european" is nonsense. Building aircraft got an global business a long time ago ...<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/463813869" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:04:53 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5047-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5047-Airbus-says-Boeing-strike-was-big-help.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>787 wing break test</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/458859868/5031-787-wing-break-test.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5031-787-wing-break-test.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5031</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5031</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Boeing was successful at breaking a part of a 787. Successful means: It broke at more than the oneandahalf-fold ever-expected maximum aerodynamic load. Anyway .... there is a <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/787milestones.tpninteractive.com/');"  href="http://787milestones.tpninteractive.com/">video</a> of the test and looking at engineers breaking huge things with huge tools is really cool ... <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> Dear Boeing ... now do this with a full wing ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/458859868" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:54:59 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5031-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5031-787-wing-break-test.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>People from Switzerland are strange</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/455930689/5024-People-from-Switzerland-are-strange.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5024-People-from-Switzerland-are-strange.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5024</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5024</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Or to be exact: At least their sense of humor in regard of their airline. The Map application in the Swiss A340-300 is really interesting. They show some POI in their map. I remember at least: <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_(SSN-593)');"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_(SSN-593)">Thresher</a>, Titanic, <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Empress_of_Ireland');"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Empress_of_Ireland">Empress of Ireland</a> and the <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Gustloff_(ship)');"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Gustloff_(ship)">Wilhelm Gustloff</a>. Those points mark big disasters in maritime history.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/455930689" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:07:15 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5024-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5024-People-from-Switzerland-are-strange.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>When it rains, it pours ...</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/452153500/5013-When-it-rains,-it-pours-....html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5013-When-it-rains,-it-pours-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5013</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5013</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay, the bad messages from Boeing doesn't end: The flight blogger reports , that Boeing has to replace <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/nonconformance-of-structural-c.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/nonconformance-of-structural-c.html">of nut plates because of non-conformance to specification</a>, as they used ones without an anti-corrosive coating. Mechanics have to remove thousands of plates and place new ones per aircraft.<br />
<br />
To add insult to injury, it's likely that several already flying planes have the same non-conforming plates:<blockquote>According to Boeing, 737s delivered to customers since August 2007 contained non-conforming nutplates. Boeing's delivery website says that 394 737s were delivered between August 2007 and October 2008.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/452153500" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:20 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5013-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5013-When-it-rains,-it-pours-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Yet another 787 delay</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/443346884/4988-Yet-another-787-delay.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4988-Yet-another-787-delay.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4988</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4988</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay, this starts to get ridiclious. Boeing announced another delay in the 787 program according to <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/153379.asp?source=rss');"  href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/153379.asp?source=rss">this article</a>. The first flight is rescheduled to next year and they didn´t announced a new date. The delivery of the first aircrafts in 2009 look impossible for me.<br />
<br />
While everybody expected that the IAM strike would have some impact to the schedule, there is another reason: Wrong installation of fasteners. According to Boeing 3% of all fasteners were incorrectly installed.<blockquote>An estimated 3 percent of the fasteners on four flight-test planes at the Everett plant, plus two others that have been assembled for ground testing, were installed incorrectly and will have to be removed and replaced.</blockquote>At a count of several hundred-thousands fasteners per aircraft, 3% is a lot of work.  Another <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122584370340899223-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA1NDgwNDQzWj.html');"  href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122584370340899223-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA1NDgwNDQzWj.html">article</a> at the Wall Street Journal writes: <blockquote>Engineers have traced it to improper instructions on what type and length of fasteners to use on certain titanium parts. The fasteners, located throughout the airplane, were installed mostly by suppliers at the plants where the major sections of the jet are being built, and affect all fuselage sections built so far</blockquote>.I start to get some doubts about entering a 787 when it will entering service in the future. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/443346884" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:37:32 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4988-guid.html</guid>
    <category>787</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<category>boeing</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4988-Yet-another-787-delay.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>LRBL</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/439502391/4976-LRBL.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4976-LRBL.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4976</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4976</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There is a new requirement from the FAA. Any airplane <a href="FAA issues final rule to increase airliner explosives survivability">certified after the 28 November has to have a desginated LRBL</a>. It´s one of this security theater things from my point of view. A LRBL is a "least risk bomb location", a location where a bomb explosion would inflict the least damage to the aircraft.  I see some problems in such a location. <br />
<br />
You have to move the bomb to get it to the LRBL. At first you have to find someone who is brave enough to move around an live explosive device. As we know of several hollywood movies  ( <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> ) an explosive device would have an trap fuse, that would  trigger the the explosion in the event of moving it around. You should at least keep the existence secret and hidden in the aircrafts operation manual to prevent the addition of such trap fuses to terrorists bombs or the usage of an more potent explosive substance. <br />
<br />
At the end: It´s the classic ammunition/armour competition. There is always one winner and it´s always the same competitor: The ammunition.The only way to increase the airliner explosive survivability is to keep of the explosives offboard. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/439502391" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:56:49 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4976-guid.html</guid>
    <category>aviation</category>
<category>security</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4976-LRBL.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Pedantic nation</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/433996309/4964-Pedantic-nation.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4964-Pedantic-nation.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4964</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4964</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    I had my trip back to Hamburg from Toulouse today. Was a nice flight. Well, except the contact with the ground crew in Toulouse. I had the impertinence to try to board while the boarding of rows 12 to 25 took place. The look from the lady was able to kill mere mortals. She didn´t allowed me to board the plane. Okay ... waiting 30 seconds. She announced the immediate boarding of all rows. Now i was allowed to enter the aircraft.  Dammed! French people are really pedantic for a nation with a revolution in its history ... <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/433996309" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:55:02 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4964-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4964-Pedantic-nation.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Nacktscanner</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/430741069/4955-Nacktscanner.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4955-Nacktscanner.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4955</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4955</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Hmmm ... die Diskussion, die dieser Tage durch die Medien getrieben wird, kommt mir seltsam bekannt vor: In <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/777-Maximal-invasive-Sicherheit.html">"Maximal invasive Sicherheit"</a> habe ich 2005 erstmals ueber Backscatter-Röntgen geschrieben. Ich muss mittlerweile sagen, das ich weniger Probleme mit der Technik habe, als damaligerzeit. Mittlerweile sind die Geräte soweit entwickelt, das sie den Körper aus dem Bild herausfiltern und somit nur noch Fremdkörper auf dem Bild zu sehen ist. Also nicht die "Kleine-Jungs"-Phantasie mit der durch Klamotten guckenden Brille. In den Flughaefen in den USA ist es uebrigens ueblich, das die Bilder nicht von den Leute geprueft werden, die auch die Menschen dazu sehen, sondern diese in einem getrennten, entfernten Raum gescreened werden. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/430741069" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:53:54 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4955-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4955-Nacktscanner.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Airtraffic over Europe</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/406506483/4881-Airtraffic-over-Europe.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4881-Airtraffic-over-Europe.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4881</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4881</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    An impressive video, that shows the traffic over the european continent. Some of the race tracks above germany are really obvious ... for example the one between Northern Germany and Frankfurt.<br />
<br />
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cQTAfIf_AOk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cQTAfIf_AOk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/406506483" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:52:54 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4881-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4881-Airtraffic-over-Europe.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Really small steps</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/405641837/4871-Really-small-steps.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4871-Really-small-steps.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4871</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4871</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Perhaps it´s just me, but i think there must be really big problems in the 787 program, when Boeing celebrates such small steps as a <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/boeing-completes-787-highblow.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/boeing-completes-787-highblow.html">successful static pressure test</a>. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/405641837" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:31:39 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4871-guid.html</guid>
    <category>787</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4871-Really-small-steps.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>In the paintshop</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/399185263/4851-In-the-paintshop.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4851-In-the-paintshop.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4851</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4851</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/welP2InJc7A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/welP2InJc7A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/399185263" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:13:53 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4851-guid.html</guid>
    <category>a380</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4851-In-the-paintshop.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A380 delivered to Quantas</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/399185264/4850-A380-delivered-to-Quantas.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4850-A380-delivered-to-Quantas.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4850</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4850</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Quantas got its <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/09/21/1221935420594.html');"  href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/09/21/1221935420594.html">first A380</a> and arrived in Sydney:<blockquote>On board the delivery flight, Captain Peter Probert, whose father brought the first Boeing 747 into Australia in 1971, told passengers that the flight had been a career highlight</blockquote>In my opinion, the <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4492-Quantas-A380-MSN014-left-the-paint-shop.html">livery of the Quantas A380</a> is the most beautiful so far ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/399185264" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:09:26 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4850-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4850-A380-delivered-to-Quantas.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>More delays for the 787 program</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/384746929/4793-More-delays-for-the-787-program.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4793-More-delays-for-the-787-program.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4793</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4793</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The problems in the 787 program doesn´t seem to end. The flightblogger reports about <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/ahead-of-a-potential-strike-bo.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/ahead-of-a-potential-strike-bo.html">further delays in the assembly of Delayliner, sorry ... Dreamliner One</a>:<blockquote>According to several sources inside the 787 program and others familiar with the schedule, assembly completion of Dreamliner One is now tentatively targeted for early October, a slip of about five weeks.<br />
<br />
Assembly completion was initially set for August 31, just four days prior to the expiration of the IAM's three-year contract.</blockquote>This retargeting was done before the union of the aircraft workers voted for a strike. I really start to think, that there won´t be any deliveries in 2009, really bad new for an aircraft that was initially planned to bring guests to the Olympic games in Beijing .... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/384746929" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:55:32 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4793-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4793-More-delays-for-the-787-program.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Interims report about the 777 crash at Heathrow</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/384746930/4792-Interims-report-about-the-777-crash-at-Heathrow.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4792-Interims-report-about-the-777-crash-at-Heathrow.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4792</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4792</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    You may remember the crash at Heathrow, where an 777 landed short of the runway. The UKs Air Accidents Investigation Branch published an <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/sites/aaib/cms_resources/G-YMMM%20Interim%20Report.pdf');"  href="http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/sites/aaib/cms_resources/G-YMMM%20Interim%20Report.pdf">report</a> to document the actual state of the investigation. At the moment, they think that ice buildup in the fuel system took out both engines. This can happen as fuel contains a certain amount of water. But the ice buildup is a little bit strange, as the aircraft was operated within the certified operational envelope, thus the AAIB already recommended that the aircraft security authorities should look after this issue not only for the 777 with Trent engines, but for future certifications. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/384746930" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:42:30 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4792-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4792-Interims-report-about-the-777-crash-at-Heathrow.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Final approach ...</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/378466818/4776-Final-approach-....html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4776-Final-approach-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4776</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4776</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <center><a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flickr.com/photos/c0t0d0s0/2807771501/');"  href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/c0t0d0s0/2807771501/" title="Experimental von c0t0d0s0 bei Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3193/2807771501_c65dfbc726.jpg" width="400" alt="Experimental" border=0 /></a></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/378466818" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:58:39 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4776-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4776-Final-approach-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A380-900</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/377358561/4772-A380-900.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4772-A380-900.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4772</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4772</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    They don´t have their own A380 aircrafts but after Air France/KLM there is a second airline interested in a even bigger A380 as Mr. Gallois disclosed in <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.aero.de/Gallois_Lufthansa_will_Airbus_A380-900_7118.htm');"  href="http://www.aero.de/Gallois_Lufthansa_will_Airbus_A380-900_7118.htm">a newspaper interview</a>. The german Lufthansa wants this plane, too. The A380-900 would be able to carry 963 passengers. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/377358561" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:06:43 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4772-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4772-A380-900.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss>
